Iraq: Iraq Gets $5.34 Billion IMF Loan to Support Economic Stability

• Iraqi economy faces double shock of lower oil prices, rising security challenges
• IMF loan supports Iraqi government’s economic reform program, ensures deficit sustainability
• Program includes measures to protect the poor, curb corruption

The IMF has approved a three-year, $5.34 Billion loan for Iraq focused on implementing economic and financial policies to help the country cope with lower oil prices and ensure deficit sustainability.

The loan will be provided under the Stand-By Arrangement facility and as well includes measures to protect vulnerable populations—critical in a time of ongoing conflict, which has resulted in over 4 million internally displaced people.

The program builds upon the success of the recent Staff-Monitored Program, which the authorities started in November 2015 to address the double shock of ISIS attacks and the sharp drop in world oil prices, and will help close a financing gap of about $18 Billion.

Speaking to IMF News, Christian Josz, IMF mission chief for Iraq, explains the underlying reasons for the loan and the major goals of the IMF-supported program.

IMF News: Why is Iraq requesting financial assistance from the IMF presently?

Josz: Iraq has been hit with a double shock for an extended time period. Initial, the ISIS insurgency since mid-2014 has created a humanitarian and social crisis that unfolded into millions of internally displaced persons, with destruction to assets and infrastructure leading to disruptions in production and in trade routes. The non-oil economy sharply contracted as a result. Second, the steep fall in world oil prices—on which Iraq depends almost entirely for its government revenue—has made the situation worse, culminating in both internal and external imbalances, large and rising budget deficits and increasing public deficit, inclunding losses in official foreign exchange reserves and some pressure on the Iraqi Dinar.

As a result, the Iraqi authorities approached the IMF with a request for emergency assistance, and we worked with the authorities to provide emergency financing of US$1.2 billion in July 2015 under the Rapid Financing Instrument. However, the intensification of the two shocks thereafter led the authorities to request a longer-term engagement with us that would not only address the fallout from the crisis, but as well lay the ground for long-delayed, deep-seated reforms. In this vein, a staff-monitored program (a program with no attached lending) started in November 2015—at the Authorities’ request—to instill the necessary conditions, and build the required capacity and track record to move to the current Stand-By Arrangement.

IMF News: What are the key policy components of Iraq's program and how will it help the country?

Josz: The program is designed with a focus on four key elements: reduce budget spending and replace public finances to a healthy national and stabilize deficit; protect spending on the social front to relieve the lives of the poorest, internally displaced people and refugees; improve the quality of public spending and prevent accumulation of unpaid deficit through improvements in public financial management; and begin the process of restructuring national-owned banks to reduce their dominance in the banking system, thereby mitigating financial sector risks and preserving the sector’s stability.

IMF News: How has Iraq’s economy been affected by ongoing conflicts and will this hinder the program’s implementation?

Josz: On the one hand, the non-oil economy contracted by 19 % in 2015 and is expected to continue to arrangement in 2016. On the other hand, the oil sector, thus far spared by the ravages of war, grew by 13 % in 2015 and by additional than 20 % during the initial five months of 2016, helping to support the broader economy, critical budget outlays, and official foreign exchange reserves amid the double shock.

While there are risks to program implementation—such as the fight against ISIS, subdued world oil prices, and uncertainty around the budget sharing agreement between the federal government and the Kurdistan Regional Government—the policy responses outlined above will help stabilize Iraq’s economy.

IMF News: Can you explain the significance of maintaining the Iraqi Dinar’s peg to the U.S. dollar?

Josz: Iraq has maintained a peg to the U.S. dollar for years, and it has served the Iraqi economy well. The peg helps provide stability amidst a highly uncertain environment, particularly with policy capacity weakened by the fight against ISIS. Under current circumstances and given the nature of the shocks, moving towards additional exchange rate flexibility would not be warranted for two key reasons.

Initial, Iraq is predominantly an oil exporter, and devaluing the Dinar would have minimal bearing on the economy’s in general trade competitiveness. Second, there is a notable degree of import dependence—almost half of Iraq’s consumption needs are imported—and devaluation would instantly trigger a spike in inflation for most food and other consumer goods, which would exacerbate by presently difficult social tensions. The authorities are committed to maintaining the Iraqi Dinar’s peg to the U.S. dollar under these circumstances, and we support this view.

Josz: The program has set a floor on a number of budget items that are considered crucial for social spending, with the objective of protecting the majority vulnerable. This covers spending directed towards the social safety net, the public distribution system (subsidies on food items, wheat, rice), agricultural product subsidies, transfers and assistance for internally displaced populations and refugees, and spending for salaries and goods and services by the ministries of health and education.

IMF News: What measures could the Iraqi government take presently to lay the basis for private sector‑led increase someday?

Josz: By preserving macroeconomic stability, inclunding deficit sustainability, the Iraqi authorities are laying the ground for private sector development. By maintaining fiscal discipline, they will create the fiscal space to pay their suppliers and international oil companies on time, which is essential to maintain financial sector stability and oil production. Furthermore, the authorities can as well spur private sector-led increase by restructuring national-owned enterprises—inclunding the six national-owned banks—and prioritizing investment projects, such as in the electricity sector, which will help improve infrastructure development.