Americas > North America > United States > Leaders of TPP member states and prospective member states at a TPP summit in 2010.

United States: Leaders of TPP member states and prospective member states at a TPP summit in 2010.

2016/03/20

I used to believe in trade agreements. That was before the wages of most Americans stagnated and a relative few at the top captured just about all the economic gains.

The old-style trade agreements of the 1960s and 1970s increased worldwide request for products made by American workers, and thereby helped push up American wages.

The new-style agreements increase worldwide request for products made by American corporations all over the world, enhancing corporate and financial profits but keeping American wages down.The fact is, recent trade deals are less about trade and additional about world investment .

Large American corporations no longer make a lot of products in the United States for export abroad. Most of what they sell abroad they make abroad.

The biggest things they “export” are ideas, designs, franchises, brands, engineering solutions, instructions, and software, coming from a relatively small group of managers, designers, and researchers in the U.S.

The Apple iPhone is assembled in China from components made in Japan, Singapore, and a half-dozen other locales. The only things coming from the U.S. are designs and instructions from a handful of engineers and managers in California.

Apple even stows most of its profits outside the U.S. so it doesn’t have to pay American taxes on them.

Recent “trade” deals have been wins for large corporations and Wall Street, along with their executives and major shareholders, because they get better direct access to foreign markets and billions of consumers.

They as well get better protection for their intellectual property – patents, trademarks, and copyrights – and for their overseas factories, equipment, and financial assets.

That’s why large corporations and Wall Street are so enthusiastic about the Trans Pacific Partnership – the giant transaction part nations responsible for 40 % of the world economy.

That transaction would give giant corporations even additional patent protection overseas. And it would allow them to challenge any country’s health, safety, and environmental laws that stand in the way of their profits – inclunding our own.

But recent trade deals haven’t been wins for most Americans.

By making it easier for American corporations to make things abroad, the deals have reduced the bargaining power of American workers to get better wages here.

The Trans Pacific Trade Partnership’s investor protections will make it safer for firms to relocate abroad – the Cato Institute describes such protections as “lowering the risk premium” on offshoring – thereby further reducing corporate incentives to make and do things in the United States, using and upgrading the skills of Americans.

Proponents say giant deals like the TPP are good for the increase of the United States economy. But that argument begs the question of whose increase they’re talking about.

Almost all the increase goes to the richest 1 %. The rest of us can buy some products cheaper than before, but most of those gains would are offset by wage losses.

In theory, the winners could fully compensate the losers and still come out ahead. But the winners don’t compensate the losers.

For example, it’s ironic that the Government is teaming up with congressional Republicans to enact the TPP, at the same time as congressional Republicans have done just about everything they can to keep down the wages of most Americans.

They’ve refused to raise the minimum wage (whose inflation-adjusted price is presently almost 25 % lower than it was in 1968), expand unemployment benefits, invest in job training, enlarge the Earned Gain Tax Credit, improve the country’s infrastructure, or expand access to public higher education.

They’ve embraced budget austerity that has slowed job and wage increase. And they’ve continued to push “trickle-down” economics – keeping tax rates low for America’s richest, protecting their tax loopholes, and fighting off any attempt to raise taxes on wealthy inheritances to their level before 2000.

I’ve seen initial-hand how effective Wall Street and large corporations are at wielding influence – using lobbyists, campaign donations, and subtle promises of next jobs to get the world deals they want.

World deals like the Trans Pacific Partnership will boost the profits of Wall Street and large corporations, and make the richest 1 % even richer. But they’ll contribute the to steady shrinkage of the American middle class.

Related Articles
  • United States sees China investment talks ‘productive’ after new offers

    2016/06/20 Bilateral investment talks between the United States and China “continue to be productive,” the US Trade Representative’s office said on Friday next the two sides exchanged new offers this week. A USTR spokeswoman said US and Chinese negotiators exchanged revised “negative lists” of sectors that would remain off-limits from foreign investment as they try to reach a transaction for a bilateral investment treaty.
  • Trump says Britain should leave EU

    2016/06/20 Donald Trump told Britons on Sunday he supported Brexit, repeating just days before the vote on June 23 that he thinks the UK would be better off outside the European Union. As the campaign to decide Britain’s EU membership restarted next a three-day hiatus following the killing of lawmaker Jo Cox, Trump, the presumptive Republican US presidential candidate, said in a newspaper interview he was backing an “out” vote.
  • My Diplomatic Moment with Mohammed Ali Written by Ambassador Herman J. Cohen

    2016/06/11 While a lot of recall and some still criticize Mohammed Ali’s refusal to be drafted to fight the U.S. war in Vietnam as a conscientious objector, I remember the time at the same time as the boxer conscientiously took on a tough fight for his country. In December 1979, the army of the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. What did this event have to do with Mohammed Ali, the American boxing champion? The Soviet aggression against Afghanistan was such a blatant illegitimate act that President Jimmy Carter was totally enraged. He wanted to punish the Soviets. He decided that the United States would boycott the Olympic games scheduled to be held in Moscow during the summer of 1998. In addition, he unleashed an international diplomatic offensive designed to persuade each other government to boycott as well.
  • Obama Japan Trip 2016: US President Calls For End To Nuclear Weapons On Historic Hiroshima Trip

    2016/05/28 Next laying a wreath at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park Friday, U.S. President Barack Obama said in a brief speech, “The memory of the morning of Aug. 6, 1945, must at no time fade.” “Death fell from the sky and the world was changed,” Obama said. During his historic visit to Hiroshima over 70 years next the Japanese city became the target of an American atomic bomb, Obama reiterated his call for a “world without nuclear weapons.”
  • USAID to grant Ethiopia $128M to fight drought

    2016/05/16 U.S Agency for International Improvment(USAID) just announced it would grant Ethiopia $128 million to fight the drought it has been facing over the completed 50 years. This grant should serve to buy food, water, treat malnutrition, and pay mobile health teams, said Thomas Stall, assistant at the humanitarian affairs, conflicts and institution’s democracy office.