Moldova: Moldova over the past year has been hard hit economically and politically

Hard times in Moldova are prompting some Moldovans to warm to the idea of unification with neighboring Romania.

On July 5, thousands of Moldovans, carrying Romanian flags, marched in the Moldovan capital, Chișinău, voicing a preference that Moldova, a predominantly ethnic Romanian country that signed an integration agreement with the EU last year, give up on independence and join Romania, which is by presently a member of the EU and NATO.

“We tried to change the political elite, from communist to democratic, we tried to ‘move away’ from the East and get closer to the West, but, nonetheless, the degree of citizens’ dissatisfaction has reached its peak,” commented 25-year-old Elena Podoleanu, a demonstrator from Chișinău. “Corruption, bureaucracy, the political class’ lack of a spine will at no time allow Moldova to be a developed country as is the case with the Baltic States.” (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, three tiny former Soviet republics, presently are EU and NATO members.)

Moldova over the completed year has been hard hit economically and politically — particularly by a scandal over banking fraud that cost taxpayers billions of dollars and highlighted rampant corruption in the judicial system. Accused of doing nothing to respond to the crisis, Chiril Gaburici resigned as prime minister in June next prosecutors questioned him about the validity of his university degree.

The government touts some economic improvements since the EU transaction – a 64.6 % increase in exports to the EU for the initial six months of this year, lower foreign deficit and a 4.8 % jump in GDP. But the July 5 march participants, inclunding 67-year-old Anastasia Fuior, are not impressed with the government statistics.

“In 24 years of independence, Moldova had a luck to show that it can be a functional national,” said Fuior, a resident of Cahul, 175 kilometers south from Chișinău, near the Romanian border. “That meant that citizens have confidence in the justice system, young women and men can benefit from a good education, a developed economy, a high level of social welfare, conditions that Moldova does not receive from its independence.”

The desire for union with Romania stems from Moldova’s own history.

The Russian Empire wrested the territory presently known as Moldova from Ottoman control in 1812, and made it part of its possessions as Bessarabia. Romania, on the western side of the Prut River, remained under Ottoman suzerainty. In 1918, next the collapse of the Russian Empire, Romania and Bessarabia united, but the union did not last long. The Soviet Union in 1940 occupied Bessarabia and additional territory to block Nazi-allied Romania. The Soviet republic of Moldova was born.

Initiatives to reunite with Romania have existed since 1991, but have at no time gained traction. Activists these days readily admit that unification will not happen any minute at this time, but say, Moldova’s problems offer no other choice than to pursue it.

“The only solution presently is union,” stressed Vitalie Prisăcaru, one of the organizers of the July 5 event. “Only by union can we go forward.”

Hundreds of activists are literally doing just that: walking by foot from Chișinău to the Romanian capital, Bucharest, a distance of roughly 488 kilometers, or about a six-and-a-half-hour drive.

On July 12, the marchers expect to reach Bucharest and, with their Romanian supporters, said Civic Youth Movement President Anatol Ursu, one of the Moldovan participants, “will go to Cotroceni Palace to ask the Romanian President Klaus Johannis to accelerate the process of reunification.”

“Bessarabia’s place is in Europe,” commented Aurelian Mihai, a Romanian MP who attended the Chișinău gathering. “Bessarabia’s place is in Romanian history and always will be.”

So far, neither Romania nor Moldova’s government has expressed a public position on the July 5 protesters’ appeal. Romanian media, however, provided heavy coverage of the July 5 gathering, which officials estimated a few thousand Romanians attended.

One former Moldovan president, Vladimir Voronin, has sharply condemned the march to Romania. In a letter to European Parliament President Martin Schulz, released on July 7, Voronin accused Bucharest of fomenting “the destruction and annexation of Moldova.”

“The Moldovan people will fight to strengthen Moldova's statehood,” Voronin wrote. “Moreover, your carelessness [in reference to European institutions] toward my country can have unpredictable consequences,” he predicted.

That, in particular, could mean Russia.

Russian politicians and officials recently have charged that Moldova blocks their dispatch of alleged peacekeeping troops to Transnistria, a breakaway Moldovan region dependent on Russian aid. Any indication that Moldova is tiptoeing toward merger with a NATO member national would heighten that alarm.

Unionists, working within a National Unity Bloc of 22 non-governmental organizations, say they recognize that Transnistria poses an obstacle for their plans.

From presently on a lot of of Moldova’s ethnic Russians, roughly six % of the people of over 3.5 million, as well are indignant about the yearning for Romania.

Fifty-eight-year-old Chișinău resident Svetlana Macari, saying in Russian that she speaks “Moldovan” rather than “Romanian,” termed the marchers “children” pursuing an impossible “dream.”

Igor Dodon, leader of the country’s major opposition party, the influential Moscow-friendly Socialist Party, has denounced the government’s silence toward what he described as “officials and representatives of right-wing extremist, nationalist and neo-Nazi” groups from Romania who attended the July 5 gathering.

Moscow and its supporters similarly have claimed that neo-Nazi sympathizers are as well active in neighboring Ukraine.

Despite the criticism, activists remain upbeat. “Union will certainly take place, like in 1918, with flowers and hora [a traditional Romanian dance], where Romanians will dance on both sides of the Prut,” predicted Ursu.