Asia > South-Eastern Asia > Vietnam > Will Vietnam’s FDI-led economy get stuck in a middle income trap?

Vietnam: Will Vietnam’s FDI-led economy get stuck in a middle income trap?

2014/10/17

The Vietnamese economy has experienced a downturn in increase since 2008. In the completed five years, the increase averaged about 5.5 % a year and is not expected to be much higher in the coming years.

For a country of per capita gain of about US$2000, that rate of increase is low. Increasing the rate of increase to somewhere in the vicinity of 8 % a year is imperative if Vietnam is to avoid the so-called middle gain trap.

An extra feature of the Vietnamese economy is that increase has increasingly been driven by foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI firms in recent years accounted for nearly half of industrial output and additional than 65 % of exports. The contribution of FDI has been even stronger in various types of machinery, such as telephones, computers, motorbikes and home electric appliances. In addition, due to high gain-elastic characteristics, machinery is presently the mainstream of industrialisation and trade in the growing East Asian region.

Because of the large flows of FDI, Vietnam has been increasingly intertwined in the machinery supply chains developed by multinational corporations in East Asia. Machinery is becoming increasingly significant in Vietnam’s trade structure: it accounted for additional than 30 % of Vietnam’s exports in 2013, compared to only 10 % in 2000. Given the expansion of FDI in this field in recent years, this share can be expected to rise further.

But Vietnam’s current lukewarm rate of increase, driven largely by FDI, may result in structural problems in the long run, where FDI-intense sectors grow quickly and other sectors do not. One reason for this worry is that most FDI firms in Vietnam are all foreign-owned. The number of joint ventures between foreign and local firms is completely small. At the end of 2013, approximately 80 % of FDI projects were all foreign-owned. Vertical linkages between FDI and local firms are as well very weak. FDI firms in machinery assembly heavily rely on imports of parts, components and other intermediate goods. They do partially procure intermediate goods in domestic resources but mainly from the supply of other foreign firms rather than local firms. This problem stems from the presence of national-owned enterprises (SOEs).

SOEs do not engage in the production of either manufactured goods for export or intermediate goods for machinery assembly industries. SOEs themselves are not only inefficient but as well affect the direction of economic policies and distort the allocation of resources. Therefore local firms in the private sector are as well not efficient suppliers of intermediate industry goods since they are placed at a disadvantage in terms of access to capital and land for investment .

So long as SOEs are not comprehensively reformed, the dual structure of the Vietnamese economy will continue.

Since the range of what is considered ‘middle gain’ is wide, from US$1000 to about US$10,000 per capita, the problems of the lower middle gain nations — those with per capita incomes up to about US$4000 — must be different from the higher middle. High middle gain nations, such as Malaysia or Thailand, are reaching the so-called Lewisian turning point, where excess labour in subsistence agriculture can no longer be soaked up by industrial sectors without increasing wages.

In order to avoid the middle gain trap, these nations should strengthen their research and development capability, emphasise the quality and appropriateness of human resources, and improve the institutional system for nourishing a dynamic private sector which pushes the structure of comparative chance toward higher-skill, additional innovation-intensive production.

For lower middle gain nations like Vietnam, still characterised by a surplus of labour, the efficient allocation of the factors of production is significant. Reforms to overcome distortions in factor markets, in order to increase the capital and land productivity, are essential.

Strong FDI performance can help Vietnam maintain a course of moderate increase someday, but unless substantial institutional reforms are carried out, the economy will continue to underperform in sectors that are not exposed to foreign investment . Someday, at the same time as wages begin to rise, foreign investors will remain only if labour productivity increases. And if it doesn’t, the Vietnam could find itself trapped in the ranks of the lower middle-gain nations.

Tran Van Tho is Professor of Economics in the School of Social Sciences, Waseda University.

Related Articles
  • Climate change laws around the world

    2017/05/14 There has been a 20-fold increase in the number of global climate change laws since 1997, according to the most comprehensive database of relevant policy and legislation. The database, produced by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and the Sabin Center on Climate Change Law, includes more than 1,200 relevant policies across 164 countries, which account for 95% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Vietnam’s dong maintained a steady course.

    2017/04/17 Strong domestic request and record high foreign investment inflows underpinned the continued rapid increase of the Vietnamese economy in 2016. According to data issued by the Government Statistics Office (GSO), GDP expanded by 6.2% in 2016, just shy of the government’s projection of 6.3% and slightly above the IMF’s estimate of 6.1%. While this was the initial time in four years that increase had slowed – from 6.7% in 2015 – per capita GDP rose 5% to a new high of $2215. Farming underperforming
  • Asia Economic Roundup: July 2016

    2016/07/18 Without a doubt Britain’s decision to abandon the European project will be remembered globally as a wake-up call for political elites around the world. It seems the people chose to go against immediate economic interest and accept an extra financial turmoil in order to address deeply seated social and identity issues. Although Asia’s exposure to the UK is relatively limited and this is not exactly a “Lehman Moment”, nonetheless we can expect a lively debate as policymakers in Asia look for an appropriate response to address the needs of vulnerable households.
  • IMF's Christine Lagarde.

    2016/03/20 Good morning—Chào các bạn I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Tran Tho Dat and the National Economic University for inviting me—and thank you, the students, for this wonderful welcome.
  • Towards A Transboundary Haze-Free ASEAN By 2020

    2015/11/16 To sustain the efforts of a transboundary haze-free ASEAN, it is significant to remain vigilant and be prepared early enough to prevent any occurrence of fires. This calls for better early warning systems and swift deployment of fire-fighting resources even before the fires starts.