Europe > Western Europe > Belgium > EU budget for recovery and Europe’s citizens

Belgium: EU budget for recovery and Europe’s citizens

2013/07/28

Europe is at a critical juncture, both economically and politically. Governments at all levels continue to feel the squeeze on public resources.

The next long term budget for the EU must reflect this by directing EU spending and investment where it makes the greatest and most visible impact for the majority of citizens. This would truly be a step towards both 'better spending’ and change in the EU in terms of economic recovery and restoring public confidence.

Generating 85 % of GDP, our major cities are the drivers of Europe’s economic increase.

At the same time, our cities are where the brunt of the crisis is being felt, and where social unrest and political discontent is most evident. A budget for Europe 2020 must recognise cities’ potential for playing a much better role in Europe’s economic recovery and therefore the urgent priority for investment in urban Europe. The European Commission’s proposition to include an urban premium in the allocation method for structural funds did half that and should be maintained.

Our continent’s model of well-managed urban concentration is the majority sustainable form of development: our cities are our assets.

Only metropolitan Europe can compete with the power of emerging megacities of Asia and Latin America. An ambitious urban schedule across EU funding programmes is not only significant for our cities but for the economic next of Europe as a whole.

Structural funds and programmes such as Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility can help ensure vital investments, in cities and beyond, by attracting private and public resources to achieve the multiplier result that is so significant to make the majority of each euro spent.

It is about maintaining and strengthening the initiatives that make a visible difference to peoples’ lives, creating jobs and supporting the development of innovative solutions and the green economy.

This as well includes initiatives that promote urban-rural collaboration, recognising the potential for cities and their surrounding areas to jointly promote territorial cohesion across the EU. Therefore, it is critical that the funding programmes investing in our cities are not undermined by the decisions on the in general budget ceiling.

But as member states failed to acknowledge on a new long term EU budget at the summit in November 2012, what seemed to be most in jeopardy are the very measures proposed by the Commission to support the "smart, sustainable and inclusive increase" that is Europe 2020’s goal.

In addition to proposing cuts to structural funds, new programmes such as Horizon 2020 and Connecting Europe recently came under pressure as ministers looked to maintain funds for agriculture and sparsely populated regions.

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has traditionally been, for good reasons, the major plank of the EU budget.

Clearly, food security is significant to all of us.

But currently the EU spends five times additional per capita in rural areas through CAP compared to funding in urban areas through structural funds.

From presently on the contribution of CAP to delivering the Europe 2020 objectives remains limited. And agricultural and rural spending is less visible and reaches far fewer people than structural funds investment , in particularly in urban areas where 75 % of the people lives.

The agreement on the next financial framework must fully take account of the scope for better balancing the investments in Europe’s territories.

The immediate costs of a new financial framework may be painful for member states in the current economic situation.

But can Europe afford a budget that ignores the vital contribution our cities can make to a smarter, greener and additional inclusive Europe by 2020 and beyond to the benefit of all Europeans?

The author is Mayor of Warsaw and President of Eurocities, a Brussels-based association

Related Articles
  • Climate change laws around the world

    2017/05/14 There has been a 20-fold increase in the number of global climate change laws since 1997, according to the most comprehensive database of relevant policy and legislation. The database, produced by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and the Sabin Center on Climate Change Law, includes more than 1,200 relevant policies across 164 countries, which account for 95% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Brexit negotiations should treat energy as ‘special case’

    2017/05/14 There are strong practical reasons why the UK and EU should treat energy as a appropriate case during Brexit negotiations, argues a new statement. The statement, jointly authored by Chatham Home, the University of Exeter and the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC), says finding common ground on energy during the Brexit negotiations would benefit both the UK and remaining EU27, while compromise may be relatively easier to achieve than for other areas.
  • Belgium Economic Outlook

    2017/05/07 Belgium Reforms benefit companies, but consumers pay the bill