Asia > Eastern Asia > China > The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation

China: The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation


The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation. The implications of Russia's turn eastward to seek a new energy partner should raise concerns in Europe over its own gas supply and wider energy security.

Gazprom's share of Europe's gas market reached approximately 30% in 2013. As the Ukraine crisis has soured relations between Russia and Europe, both sides are looking to diversify.

Europe's need to diversify away from Russian gas is hardly new. Russia's tendency to use gas as a political tool to put pressure on Ukraine and Europe has demonstrated the risks of relying on one partner. Additional globally, growing concern around climate change and its impact on national security as a "threat multiplier" has lent support to the world's reduced use of fossil fuels. From presently on events in Ukraine and the Sino-Russian gas transaction have accelerated the urgency with which Europe needs to seek new energy sources.

We still have some time to do so. Despite the transaction with China, Russia in the short term will continue to need the European market. The 38bn cubic metres it plans to export to China is small compared to the 161.5bn cubic metres it exported to Europe in 2013. It is likely that China received some concession on price, given that this was the major sticking point delaying the transaction since the discussions began, but it means that Russia's exports to China will not replace the revenue Russia relies on from its European exports. Russia will as well have to pay to build the pipeline infrastructure to China, and gas will only be transported from 2018.

But there is no doubt that, in the long term, Russia gains the upper hand in pipeline politics over Europe by engaging with an alternative gas partner. It may threaten to divert gas earmarked for Europe to China. In theory, this may be an blank threat, given that even the optimum target capacity of 60bn cubic metres to China is still low compared to Russian exports to Europe. But even so, any leverage Europe had in such gas disputes with Russia will diminish. Ukraine and eastern Europe would suffer most from this decline given Ukraine's current instability. Ukraine seems unlikely to recover its political relations with Russia.

The challenge for Europe is that there is no single alternative that could fully displace Russia's supply volumes or match its price. Developing alternative sources will take time. Liquid nitrogen gas is an option available from a number of sources, namely Qatar, Nigeria and the US, but the cost of importing it will be higher than the cost of importing gas, and new infrastructure will be required to receive shipments.

Renewable energy is attractive from an energy security perspective, but it is not reliable and will not produce quantities comparable to fossil fuels. Azerbaijan and, additional promisingly, Turkmenistan are options. But this will not satisfy European request in full and is only set approaching online for Europe in 2019. Shale gas is a potentially powerful alternative, but it comes with its own challenges. Governments have faced social turmoil against fracking at home; France and Bulgaria have banned it. Reserve estimates can turn out to be underwhelming, as seen in Poland.

Given its position as a gas exporter, Russia was able to act quickly in diversifying its customer base by turning to China. As a gas customer, Europe does not have this flexibility. From presently on Europe can learn from the expediency with which President Putin reacted to the shifting political and economic landscape in the wake of Ukraine to sign a transaction with China. A blend of alternative energy sources for Europe will no doubt cost additional, but Europe's energy security depends on diversification along these lines.

Europe is unlikely to become completely free from Russian gas in the near next. But it is a security risk to rely too much on one partner and it makes sense to have less energy dependence on Russia, or on any one energy source. Less energy interdependence with Russia would probably benefit both sides. For security reasons, it would certainly benefit Europe.

Related Articles
  • Chinese President Xi Jinping landed Tuesday morning in Harare

    2015/12/02 Chinese President Xi Jinping landed Tuesday morning in Harare and was greeted with a 21-gun salute by his Zimbabwean counterpart Robert Mugabe. This marks the initial visit of a Chinese leader to the country since 1996. The visit shows Beijing’s interest in “cementing relations between the two nations”, as specified by Xi, who applauded Zimbabwe’s role as acting chair of the African Union in favoring and reinforcing the development of the continent”. China last year invested $238 million in Zimbabwe, becoming its initial economic partner.
  • China will work with African countries to make a China-Africa summit late this year a successful event

    2015/11/30 China will work with African nations to make a China-Africa summit late this year a successful event, President Xi Jinping said on Friday while conference with visiting South African President Jacob Zuma. The two nations announced that the sixth ministerial conference of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation will be upgraded to a summit and is scheduled for Dec 4 and 5 in South Africa. The forum, held each three years since 2000, was upgraded to a summit once before, in 2006 in Beijing, and drew participants from 48 nations. National leaders of China and South Africa will invite African heads of national to the summit this year, Foreign Minister Wang Yi and his South African counterpart, Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, announced on Thursday.
  • China will take over the G-20 presidency on December 1 and host the summit for the first time,

    2015/11/30 In the late 1990s, the world seemed to be lurching from one economic crisis to an extra. But only a handful of developed nations, known as the Group of Seven, seemed to have the last word on what everyone else should do about it. One man thought there was something wrong with that: Paul Martin, the former prime minister of Canada, who is widely credited as the architect of the Group of 20. Established in 1999, the grouping serves as a forum for world economic leaders, such as finance ministers and central bank governors, from both developed and developing nations to discuss pressing issues. This year's G-20 summit will be held in Antalya, Turkey, from November 15 to 16. China will take over the G-20 presidency on December 1 and host the summit for the initial time, in the major eastern city of Hangzhou, in November next year.
  • Chinese President Xi Jinping and his African counterparts will have much to celebrate

    2015/11/30 Chinese President Xi Jinping and his African counterparts will have much to celebrate at the upcoming Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in Johannesburg, South Africa next month. At the same time as the forum was initial established in 2000, trade volume between China and Africa was only $10 billion. Presently China has become the continent's major trading partner, with trade volume expected to exceed $300 billion in 2015. By the end of 2014, additional than 2,500 Chinese companies were conducting business in Africa, which has a total people of additional than 1.1 billion.
  • Li Gang, deputy chairman of Evergrande's board,

    2015/11/30 Evergrande Group says it has bought half of a joint venture insurance company, a move a person close to the developer says is aimed at helping it explore the financial sector. Evergrande held a press conference on November 22 to announce the transaction for Great Eastern Life Assurance (China) Co. Ltd. (GELC). The insurer's name was changed to Evergrande Life Insurance Co. Ltd. The source close to the firm said Evergrande paid Chongqing Land Group and Chongqing City Construction Investment (Group) Co. Ltd. 3.9 billion yuan for the 50 % stake in the insurer.