Asia > Eastern Asia > China > The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation

China: The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation

2014/05/28

The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation. The implications of Russia's turn eastward to seek a new energy partner should raise concerns in Europe over its own gas supply and wider energy security.

Gazprom's share of Europe's gas market reached approximately 30% in 2013. As the Ukraine crisis has soured relations between Russia and Europe, both sides are looking to diversify.

Europe's need to diversify away from Russian gas is hardly new. Russia's tendency to use gas as a political tool to put pressure on Ukraine and Europe has demonstrated the risks of relying on one partner. Additional globally, growing concern around climate change and its impact on national security as a "threat multiplier" has lent support to the world's reduced use of fossil fuels. From presently on events in Ukraine and the Sino-Russian gas transaction have accelerated the urgency with which Europe needs to seek new energy sources.

We still have some time to do so. Despite the transaction with China, Russia in the short term will continue to need the European market. The 38bn cubic metres it plans to export to China is small compared to the 161.5bn cubic metres it exported to Europe in 2013. It is likely that China received some concession on price, given that this was the major sticking point delaying the transaction since the discussions began, but it means that Russia's exports to China will not replace the revenue Russia relies on from its European exports. Russia will as well have to pay to build the pipeline infrastructure to China, and gas will only be transported from 2018.

But there is no doubt that, in the long term, Russia gains the upper hand in pipeline politics over Europe by engaging with an alternative gas partner. It may threaten to divert gas earmarked for Europe to China. In theory, this may be an blank threat, given that even the optimum target capacity of 60bn cubic metres to China is still low compared to Russian exports to Europe. But even so, any leverage Europe had in such gas disputes with Russia will diminish. Ukraine and eastern Europe would suffer most from this decline given Ukraine's current instability. Ukraine seems unlikely to recover its political relations with Russia.

The challenge for Europe is that there is no single alternative that could fully displace Russia's supply volumes or match its price. Developing alternative sources will take time. Liquid nitrogen gas is an option available from a number of sources, namely Qatar, Nigeria and the US, but the cost of importing it will be higher than the cost of importing gas, and new infrastructure will be required to receive shipments.

Renewable energy is attractive from an energy security perspective, but it is not reliable and will not produce quantities comparable to fossil fuels. Azerbaijan and, additional promisingly, Turkmenistan are options. But this will not satisfy European request in full and is only set approaching online for Europe in 2019. Shale gas is a potentially powerful alternative, but it comes with its own challenges. Governments have faced social turmoil against fracking at home; France and Bulgaria have banned it. Reserve estimates can turn out to be underwhelming, as seen in Poland.

Given its position as a gas exporter, Russia was able to act quickly in diversifying its customer base by turning to China. As a gas customer, Europe does not have this flexibility. From presently on Europe can learn from the expediency with which President Putin reacted to the shifting political and economic landscape in the wake of Ukraine to sign a transaction with China. A blend of alternative energy sources for Europe will no doubt cost additional, but Europe's energy security depends on diversification along these lines.

Europe is unlikely to become completely free from Russian gas in the near next. But it is a security risk to rely too much on one partner and it makes sense to have less energy dependence on Russia, or on any one energy source. Less energy interdependence with Russia would probably benefit both sides. For security reasons, it would certainly benefit Europe.

Comments

Related Articles
  • China, ECOWAS agree on strategic mechanism for effective cooperation

    2014/06/13 ECOWAS and China have agreed to establish a strategic consultative mechanism that will provide the framework for defining and implementing their cooperation for better effectiveness. The agreement was reached on Monday during a working visit to the ECOWAS Commission, Abuja headquarters, by a three-member Chinese delegation, led by Lu Shaye, Director General, African Affairs Department, in the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This comes barely a month next both parties signed a Memorandum of Considerate (MoU) under which China will provide US$5 million dollars in “deployable headquarters equipment” to the ECOWAS Standby Force (ESF). As well during the conference, China offered US$200,000 in capacity building support to ECOWAS, one of the five priorities identified by the delegation, to enable the organization realize the objective of its ongoing institutional reform and repositioning for better efficiency.
  • China Mobile to buy into True

    2014/06/10 True Corporation's almost decade-old quest for a strategic partner is over as it forged an alliance with world telecom giant China Mobile International Ltd (CMI) to support its ambitious regional increase. Under the agreement, CMI, a all owned subsidiary of China Mobile Communication Co, will pay 28.6 billion baht for an 18% stake in Thailand's leading telecommunications conglomerate, backed by billionaire Dhanin Chearavanont. A partnership arrangement was signed yesterday in Bangkok. authentic will issue 10.077 billion new shares to existing shareholders and CMI at a price of 6.45 baht per share. Assuming full placement, the share issue will raise 65 billion baht in capital for the company.
  • APG is to spend $650m (€477m) on a 20% stake in Chinese warehousing developer

    2014/05/29 APG is to spend $650m (€477m) on a 20% stake in Chinese warehousing developer and operator e-Shang as part of a joint venture agreement. The Dutch pension fund investment manager’s stake gives it exposure to China’s logistics sector. The partnership will invest in and develop logistics assets across China. Sachin Doshi, APG chief of non-listed real estate for Asia-Pacific, said the investment manager had watched the sector “closely” in recent years as it experienced the increase of third-party logistics, e-commerce and the evolution of domestic consumption patterns.
  • Economic slowdown weighs on China retailers

    2014/05/28 China’s slowing economy, a crackdown on corruption, and the rise of online shopping are increasingly eating into earnings for some of the country’s traditional retailers – hitting sales at bricks and mortar stores such as shoe shops and supermarkets. Footwear chain Belle International and supermarket operator China Resources Enterprise both blamed a drop-off in economic increase as they reported sluggish earnings this week. “With the economy continuing its structural rebalancing and slower increase becoming the new normal, consumer confidence has been low and consumer sentiment weak,” Belle said in a statement to the Hong Kong stock exchange. The company, which has additional than 20,000 outlets across China, is a key distributor for western sports brands such as Nike, Adidas and Puma. Revenues at its footwear business grew 5 % in the 14 months through February, which the company said was “significantly lower than prior years”.
  • China launches US$2 billion fund for development projects in Africa

    2014/05/24 The African Development bank (AfDB) and the Popular Bank of China (PBOC) on Thursday signed an agreement which establishes a co-financing fund of US$2 billion called 'Africa Growing Together Fund (AGTF)'. A statement made public at the AfDB annual general assembly conference in the Rwandan capital, Kigali, says that it is expected particularly that the resources from AGTF will be allocated, over a 10-year period, to finance development projects in Africa, guaranteed or non guaranteed by the government, with AfDB.