Asia > Eastern Asia > China > The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation

China: The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation

2014/05/28

The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation. The implications of Russia's turn eastward to seek a new energy partner should raise concerns in Europe over its own gas supply and wider energy security.

Gazprom's share of Europe's gas market reached approximately 30% in 2013. As the Ukraine crisis has soured relations between Russia and Europe, both sides are looking to diversify.

Europe's need to diversify away from Russian gas is hardly new. Russia's tendency to use gas as a political tool to put pressure on Ukraine and Europe has demonstrated the risks of relying on one partner. Additional globally, growing concern around climate change and its impact on national security as a "threat multiplier" has lent support to the world's reduced use of fossil fuels. From presently on events in Ukraine and the Sino-Russian gas transaction have accelerated the urgency with which Europe needs to seek new energy sources.

We still have some time to do so. Despite the transaction with China, Russia in the short term will continue to need the European market. The 38bn cubic metres it plans to export to China is small compared to the 161.5bn cubic metres it exported to Europe in 2013. It is likely that China received some concession on price, given that this was the major sticking point delaying the transaction since the discussions began, but it means that Russia's exports to China will not replace the revenue Russia relies on from its European exports. Russia will as well have to pay to build the pipeline infrastructure to China, and gas will only be transported from 2018.

But there is no doubt that, in the long term, Russia gains the upper hand in pipeline politics over Europe by engaging with an alternative gas partner. It may threaten to divert gas earmarked for Europe to China. In theory, this may be an blank threat, given that even the optimum target capacity of 60bn cubic metres to China is still low compared to Russian exports to Europe. But even so, any leverage Europe had in such gas disputes with Russia will diminish. Ukraine and eastern Europe would suffer most from this decline given Ukraine's current instability. Ukraine seems unlikely to recover its political relations with Russia.

The challenge for Europe is that there is no single alternative that could fully displace Russia's supply volumes or match its price. Developing alternative sources will take time. Liquid nitrogen gas is an option available from a number of sources, namely Qatar, Nigeria and the US, but the cost of importing it will be higher than the cost of importing gas, and new infrastructure will be required to receive shipments.

Renewable energy is attractive from an energy security perspective, but it is not reliable and will not produce quantities comparable to fossil fuels. Azerbaijan and, additional promisingly, Turkmenistan are options. But this will not satisfy European request in full and is only set approaching online for Europe in 2019. Shale gas is a potentially powerful alternative, but it comes with its own challenges. Governments have faced social turmoil against fracking at home; France and Bulgaria have banned it. Reserve estimates can turn out to be underwhelming, as seen in Poland.

Given its position as a gas exporter, Russia was able to act quickly in diversifying its customer base by turning to China. As a gas customer, Europe does not have this flexibility. From presently on Europe can learn from the expediency with which President Putin reacted to the shifting political and economic landscape in the wake of Ukraine to sign a transaction with China. A blend of alternative energy sources for Europe will no doubt cost additional, but Europe's energy security depends on diversification along these lines.

Europe is unlikely to become completely free from Russian gas in the near next. But it is a security risk to rely too much on one partner and it makes sense to have less energy dependence on Russia, or on any one energy source. Less energy interdependence with Russia would probably benefit both sides. For security reasons, it would certainly benefit Europe.

Related Articles
  • Despite slowing growth, China in Africa for the long haul

    2015/03/20 China lowered its 2015 increase projections to “around 7 %” on 5 March - the slowest rate in 24 years - amid fears that a slowdown in the Asian powerhouse could dampen economic ties with Africa. But while request for commodities - which formed the basis of the China-Africa relationship so far - is set to slow, outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) trends on the back of China’s ‘New Silk Road’ grand strategy indicates that China’s focus on Africa is here for the long haul, according to analysis by South Africa’s Standard Bank. Chinese increase was projected to hit 7.4 % through 2015 before the downward revision was announced by Premier Li Keqiang. China’s economic fortunes are intimately tied to the ascendance of a lot of African economies over the completed decade. African commodities played a significant role in fuelling China’s average of 10 % increase over the completed five years, supplying raw materials for manufacturing and a booming real estate market.
  • China's Huayi Brothers Pacts With Major U.S. Film Company

    2015/03/19 China’s major privately run film production company, Huayi Brothers Media, says that it has reached a transaction to finance, co-produce, and release 18 feature films by 2017 with an unnamed US partner. The Beijing-based company did not identify its US counterpart but people familiar with the situation said it was Burbank-based STX Entertainment. The venture is not the initial co-production transaction Huayi has done in Hollywood, but it is — according to the film group — the initial time a Chinese company will take part in all process of Hollywood filmmaking, from investment to production and distribution, and get a cut of total world revenues from films in addition to the Better China distribution rights.
  • Tesla owners in China are a well-connected bunch.

    2015/03/07 For $104,000, Yu Hangmei expected a car that could, at the very least, be driven. What Ms. Yu said she got instead was a new electric Tesla Model S sedan and a malfunctioning charging station. While driving through her town in coastal Zhejiang Province recently, Ms. Yu, 45, realized that even though she had plugged in the vehicle, the battery was almost dead. “I thought next a day of charging it was fully charged, but turns out it wasn’t charged at all,” said Ms. Yu, an artifact exporter. Tesla owners need an electric charger specifically calibrated to the vehicle’s voltage and current requirements, still something of a rarity near her home. “Luckily I bumped into a fellow Tesla owner online who let me charge at his place. It took three hours.”
  • China plans to continue stockpiling grain, edible oil and other commodities

    2015/03/07 China plans to continue stockpiling grain, edible oil and other commodities but will reduce its consumption of coal as it plans to tackle air pollution. The country will spend 154.6bn yuan ($24.67bn) this year on its stockpiles, an increase of 33 %, the Ministry of Finance said in a statement to the National People’s Congress under way in Beijing. Last year spending rose 22 %. Low commodity prices give China an opportunity to build up its strategic reserves. The country imports roughly 60 % of the crude oil it uses, and has been building up its strategic and commercial reserves as oil prices have fallen about 50 % since last summer. But coal is the one commodity it wants to use less of. The country will strive for zero increase of coal in key areas of the country, Premier Li Keqiang said in his work statement.
  • China’s major Internet company, Alibaba, is adding to its modest presence in Silicon Valley,

    2015/03/07 China’s major Internet company, Alibaba, is adding to its modest presence in Silicon Valley, but not in the way a lot of have expected. In an announcement on Wednesday, the Chinese e-commerce giant said it planned to open its initial data center outside of China in Silicon Valley. Instead of supporting the company’s hugely popular e-commerce sites, the center will help Alibaba spread a less well-known but growing side of its business: cloud services for businesses. Similar to the services offered by Amazon that lease computing power to businesses, Alibaba has been slowly wooing clients in China to use its services. A lot of vendors who sell on Alibaba’s e-commerce sites use the services, but it has been slowly adding larger clients. The company said the new data center would initial cater to Chinese businesses operating in China, but in the second half of the year do additional to aim at foreign clients. The company did not specify at the same time as the center would open, how much it was investing in the center, or how large it would be.