Asia > Eastern Asia > China > The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation

China: The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation


The gas transaction announced last week saw agreement between Russia and China next 10 years of negotiation. The implications of Russia's turn eastward to seek a new energy partner should raise concerns in Europe over its own gas supply and wider energy security.

Gazprom's share of Europe's gas market reached approximately 30% in 2013. As the Ukraine crisis has soured relations between Russia and Europe, both sides are looking to diversify.

Europe's need to diversify away from Russian gas is hardly new. Russia's tendency to use gas as a political tool to put pressure on Ukraine and Europe has demonstrated the risks of relying on one partner. Additional globally, growing concern around climate change and its impact on national security as a "threat multiplier" has lent support to the world's reduced use of fossil fuels. From presently on events in Ukraine and the Sino-Russian gas transaction have accelerated the urgency with which Europe needs to seek new energy sources.

We still have some time to do so. Despite the transaction with China, Russia in the short term will continue to need the European market. The 38bn cubic metres it plans to export to China is small compared to the 161.5bn cubic metres it exported to Europe in 2013. It is likely that China received some concession on price, given that this was the major sticking point delaying the transaction since the discussions began, but it means that Russia's exports to China will not replace the revenue Russia relies on from its European exports. Russia will as well have to pay to build the pipeline infrastructure to China, and gas will only be transported from 2018.

But there is no doubt that, in the long term, Russia gains the upper hand in pipeline politics over Europe by engaging with an alternative gas partner. It may threaten to divert gas earmarked for Europe to China. In theory, this may be an blank threat, given that even the optimum target capacity of 60bn cubic metres to China is still low compared to Russian exports to Europe. But even so, any leverage Europe had in such gas disputes with Russia will diminish. Ukraine and eastern Europe would suffer most from this decline given Ukraine's current instability. Ukraine seems unlikely to recover its political relations with Russia.

The challenge for Europe is that there is no single alternative that could fully displace Russia's supply volumes or match its price. Developing alternative sources will take time. Liquid nitrogen gas is an option available from a number of sources, namely Qatar, Nigeria and the US, but the cost of importing it will be higher than the cost of importing gas, and new infrastructure will be required to receive shipments.

Renewable energy is attractive from an energy security perspective, but it is not reliable and will not produce quantities comparable to fossil fuels. Azerbaijan and, additional promisingly, Turkmenistan are options. But this will not satisfy European request in full and is only set approaching online for Europe in 2019. Shale gas is a potentially powerful alternative, but it comes with its own challenges. Governments have faced social turmoil against fracking at home; France and Bulgaria have banned it. Reserve estimates can turn out to be underwhelming, as seen in Poland.

Given its position as a gas exporter, Russia was able to act quickly in diversifying its customer base by turning to China. As a gas customer, Europe does not have this flexibility. From presently on Europe can learn from the expediency with which President Putin reacted to the shifting political and economic landscape in the wake of Ukraine to sign a transaction with China. A blend of alternative energy sources for Europe will no doubt cost additional, but Europe's energy security depends on diversification along these lines.

Europe is unlikely to become completely free from Russian gas in the near next. But it is a security risk to rely too much on one partner and it makes sense to have less energy dependence on Russia, or on any one energy source. Less energy interdependence with Russia would probably benefit both sides. For security reasons, it would certainly benefit Europe.

Related Articles
  • China dependent Latin American markets and currencies plunge on Monday

    2015/08/26 Mexico's IPC (Frankfurt: IPEN.F - news) index closed down 1.64%, regaining some ground next opening with losses of additional than six %. Argentine stocks closed down 6.3%, Chilean shares lost 2.77% and Colombian shares shed 3.52%. The losses appeared to be driven by concern over shrinking Chinese request for raw materials.Stock markets around Latin America posted heavy losses Monday as plunging Chinese shares unleashed fresh turmoil on global markets. In Brazil, home to the region's largest stock exchange, the IBOVESPA index in Sao Paulo closed down 3.03%, after plunging 6.49% in opening trade.
  • US stocks surge after China cuts rates

    2015/08/26 U.S. stocks surged in early trading Tuesday next mainland China's central bank cut its key interest rate in a bid to boost increase in the world's second-major economy. The move erased some of the stock market's heavy losses from a day before at the same time as concerns over a slowdown in China's economy rattled world markets and knocked down the Dow Jones industrial average by additional than 588 points. The Dow was up 349 points, or 2.2 %, to 16,221 as of 10:18 a.m. EDT in the U.S., while the Standard & Poor's 500 index gained 45 points, or 2.4 %, to 1,938. The Nasdaq composite rose 137 points, or 3 %, to 4,664.
  • Shanghai stocks slump, but Asian bourses bounce

    2015/08/25 Shanghai stocks tumbled on Tuesday, extending their steepest four-day rout in almost 20 years next worries about China's faltering economy sent world markets reeling, but other Asian stocks bounced back from heavy early losses. A slump in Chinese shares sparked panic across world markets on Monday, wiping some $2.7 trillion off world equities as markets from London to Buenos Aires were caught up in the plunge. The dollar hit a seven-month low against the yen in New York -- prompting a warning from Japan -- while US oil finished below $40 a barrel for the initial time in six years. Most Asian bourses cast off heavy early falls Tuesday as sentiment improved, with Hong Kong up 0.72 % in afternoon trading while Sydney added 1.96 % and Seoul climbed 0.96 %.
  • Taipei City Mayor Ko Wen-je China trip sets tone of pragmatic cross-strait ties

    2015/08/24 Ideologically speaking, Taipei City Mayor Ko Wen-je may belong to the so-called deep-green, pro-independence fundamentalist camp, but his ideology seems to have seldom gotten in the way of his pragmatism, which was on display in his just concluded trip to China. Of course, by welcoming Ko to a three-day official visit to Shanghai, China has as well shown some sort of pragmatism, or at least it took a tiny step back from its unwavering ideology against any form of the pro-Taiwan independence cause. It was a necessary step that Beijing had to take, judging from the political climate in Taiwan: the China-friendly Kuomintang lost a humiliating defeat in last November's local elections to the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party, which stands a good luck of taking the presidency and controlling the parliament come next year.
  • World markets plunge on fears of a China-led global slowdown

    2015/08/24 A statement overnight showed China's manufacturing sector shrank at the fastest pace since 2009, exacerbating worries about the health of its economy and whether the government would take further steps to stem its slowdown. The Russell 2000 index of small-cap stocks as well confirmed a move into correction territory, a 10% decline from its most recent closing high on June 23. The S&P 500 suffered its biggest daily % drop in nearly four years and the Dow confirmed it had entered into correction territory as fears of a China-led world slowdown rattled investors around the world. The S&P slumped 5.8% for the week, its biggest weekly % decline since September 2011.