Asia > Southern Asia > India > India-Malaysia Partnership In The Pink

India: India-Malaysia Partnership In The Pink

2017/05/29

India views its ties with Malaysia as a core element of its Act East Policy, while the Malaysian leadership has taken note of India’s geopolitical importance and the a lot of attractions of its market Both nations share a strong commitment to multiculturalism, democracy and inclusive development.

It’s the 60th anniversary this year of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Malaysia and India, and an apt time to take stock of ties that have been mostly in a steady national of bloom.

Malaysia is one of the prominent leaders of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), together with Singapore, Indonesia and Thailand. All four nations enjoy multi-faceted ties with India, both in the regional and bilateral contexts, while as well having a very substantial relationship with China.

The Malaysian leadership’s driving motivations in its relationship with India are: unease with China’s assertiveness in the region, realisation of India’s geopolitical importance in Asia, and the attractions of the growing Indian market. This explains why India-Malaysia relations currently are in the pink. But divergences and differences too have marked this relationship, given the two nations’ different locations, national of governance and development, and interpretations of national interest.

The Malaysian prime minister was part the four ASEAN leaders who attended the Belt Road Forum (BRF) in Beijing before this month. (The other leaders were from Indonesia, Philippines and Vietnam.) India pointedly declined the invitation.

Malaysia is an active participant in current negotiations for the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which includes both China and India. At the same time, Malaysia is one of the four ASEAN nations[1] that are part of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP); it is instantly engaged in endeavours to ensure TPP’s survival, next President Trump ordered America’s withdrawal from it.

There is from presently on an extra significant clue about Malaysia’s regional strategy: as the Trump government shows unwillingness to assert leadership in East Asia, Malaysia and other ASEAN members have chosen to be additional conciliatory towards China on the contentious South China Sea question. The way has recently been cleared for a draft framework agreement on the Code of Conduct (COC).[2] New Delhi seems busy deciphering the implications of this development.

Against this backdrop, the Malaysian government has been notably consistent in according priority to deepen economic, political, security and defence cooperation with India. Formally, the two nations have an “enhanced Strategic Partnership”. India views its ties with Malaysia as a core element of its Act East Policy. Both nations share a strong commitment to multiculturalism, democracy, pluralism and inclusive development.

On the diplomatic side, India and Malaysia work together to uphold the freedom of navigation and over flights in the South China Sea and elsewhere and to adhere to the UN Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). They as well display a resolute will to counter terrorism and radicalisation. In fact, India admires the Malaysian model of moderate Islam and the success of its de-radicalisation programme. The latter may have some relevance to the situation in India. This mutual considerate seems to have insulated official relations from being disturbed by the activities of Zakir Naik, an Indian Islamic preacher, currently under the scanner of Indian agencies, who was based in Malaysia for several years.[3] Counter-terrorism cooperation and intelligence exchange seem to be on a increase path.

A series of high-level visits has nurtured political ties. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Prime Minister Modi visited Malaysia in 2010 and 2015 respectively. Malaysian Prime Minister Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak paid three visits to India – in 2010, 2012 and, most recently, from 30 March-4 April 2017. The new visit not only showcased the close friendship and expansion of bilateral cooperation, but as well indicated their next trajectory. It is worth recalling that bilateral relations used to be frayed and complex during the era of the previous prime minister, Mahathir Mohammed, whereas they have showed steady development since Najib came to power in 2009.

Mutual negative perceptions, which existed in the completed, have diminished, but they have not disappeared all. The Indian side tends to view Malaysia as being too close to China, deeply sympathetic towards Pakistan, and always anxious to assert its Islamic identity under the influence of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The Malaysian side seems to dwell on the disconnect between India’s commitments and delivery, the huge asymmetry of power between China and India, and the impressive success of Malaysia’s development model as compared to India’s. Nevertheless, politico-economic convergences and bonds of history, culture and the diaspora have ensured that the two nations essentially relate to each other as good partners and friends today.

Malaysia’s proximity to China notwithstanding, Kuala Lumpur prefers to keep its channels to New Delhi open. In a subtle reference to the China factor, PM Modi recently observed, “Prime Minister Najib and I are as well conscious of our role and responsibility in promoting economic prosperity, freedom of navigation, and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly its Oceans.”

The economic dimension is undoubtedly of considerable significance. Bilateral trade has been somewhat erratic due to the world slowdown: it decreased from $16.9 billion in 2014-15 to $12.8 billion in 2015-16. The two governments want it to reach the level of $15 billion in the immediate next. Investment quantum looks healthy. Malaysian investments in India, valued at $7 billion, surpassed Indian investments in Malaysia standing at $2.5 billion by a large margin. Malaysian companies have been a force to reckon with, particularly in the infrastructure sector. According to official calculations, Malaysian companies have completed 53 highway and road projects in India so far.

The CEO Forum, held during PM Najib’s recent visit, underlined the need for fresh investment flows both ways, identifying “the knowledge deficit on the opportunities available”[5] as a challenge to be addressed. Infrastructure, healthcare, education, SME, civil aviation and tourism were considered as key sectors for further cooperation. While Indian companies are exploring new possibilities in the railways and water treatment sectors, Malaysian corporates can certainly contribute additional to road construction, power generation, airport and port development. Further, an expectation exists that the Malaysian Pension and Provident Funds may invest additional in Indian infrastructure assets. There is a shared business view in both nations that economic ties would benefit from early conclusion of a balanced RCEP that encompasses trade in goods and services.

The people-to-people aspect of the relationship is as well significant. A country of 28 million, Malaysia is home to a nearly two million-strong Indian origin community that accounts for 7% of the total people. This is rated as the highest share of Indian diaspora in any East Asian country. The Malaysian PM began his recent visit from Tamil Nadu, presumably in recognition of the fact that 85% of Malaysian Indians are of Tamil origin. His taking a selfie with popular star Rajinikanth revealed a desire to cultivate the Tamil connection as the next elections approach in Malaysia. This is a country where Indian cultural products are completely popular.

A lot of in India’s strategic community hold the view that Malaysia, together with the other Large Three of ASEAN, needs to work towards increasing its unity and solidarity. This alone will make ASEAN’s claim to “centrality” – its pivotal, even leading, role in East Asia – credible. This centrality has been under much stress in recent years from China’s policies and actions. It is in India’s interest to strengthen ASEAN as a robust and active actor in Asian affairs. This strategic calculus provides a powerful rationale for the two nations to further enhance their mutual cooperation.

PM Najib’s portrayal of India and Malaysia as the two “examples of moderate, civilised, peaceful nations that prize education, the safety and well-being of our peoples, and the equitable and sustainable pursuit of increase” is, thus, right on the dot.

Related Articles
  • India's Wholesale Price Inflation Slows In June

    2017/07/15 India's wholesale price inflation eased additional than expected in June, data from the Ministry of Commerce & Industry showed Friday. Wholesale prices increased 0.9 % year-on-year in June, slower than the 2.17 % rise in May. Inflation was estimate to relieve moderately to 1.39 %. Build up inflation rate in the financial year so far was -0.44 % compared to a build up rate of 3.71 % in the corresponding period of the previous year.
  • Indian economic diplomacy in the Belt and Road era

    2017/07/10 In May 2017, India curtly and publicly declined to attend Chinese President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Forum (BRF) in Beijing. India’s snub was both uncharacteristic and controversial, although not unexpected. On 13 May 2017, a day before the BRF plenary, a spokesperson for the Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) provided a formal explanation for India’s absence from the forum. From the statement it seems clear that there is a wide gap between the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as it was understood by a lot of participants at the BRF, and as interpreted by India’s MEA and much of India’s policy elite.
  • Triple Challenge For Agriculture: Trade, Food Security And New Technologies

    2017/07/08 One may rightly ask why the three topics of trade, food security and new technology may be ‘challenges’ for agriculture and by extension food and fibre production. How do all three help ensure a food fasten world? World trade deals such as those falling under the remit of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) have long been difficult to negotiate particularly those encompassing agriculture. And the same goes for Regional deals. The United States has pulled out of the newly-agreed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and wants to re-negotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). There is as well the similar situation of the United Kingdom wishing to pull out of the world’s major trading block, thinking it can quickly negotiate new trade deals with other nations and world areas.
  • Crimea: Circumventing Trade Sanctions Via Novorossiysk

    2017/07/08 Despite trade sanctions, Crimea is maintaining connections to international markets. Crimean traders are performing some logistical gymnastics to skirt sanctions, in particular transiting goods through the Russian port of Novorossiysk. On paper, of course, Crimea is experiencing a severe trade crisis. Official statistics indicate that Crimea’s import volume in 2016 shrank by a full third compared to the 2015 level, a drop of $33.6 million. Exports fell by $31.8 million, a 40-% decline from 2015. The city of Sevastopol, which is not formally part of the Republic of Crimea, reported a 12.6 % fall in its imports and 66.8 % fall in its exports in the same period, with volumes shrinking to $33.4 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
  • There's nothing like going to the beach with friends

    2017/07/07 As Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi wrapped up his three-day visit to Israel, a visit to a beach with his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday made waves on social media next the two were pictured taking a barefoot stroll in the Mediterranean. His trip, the initial of its kind for an Indian premier, included new economic deals, and time spent with Netanyahu to deepen their relationship. They ended the trip with a visit to Olga Beach in the northern coastal city of Haifa, strolling in the shallow water with a photographer and camera crew on hand.