Asia > Eastern Asia > China > Throughout China, equally ambitious projects with multibillion-dollar price tags are by presently underway.

China: Throughout China, equally ambitious projects with multibillion-dollar price tags are by presently underway.


DALIAN — The plan here seems far-fetched — a $36 billion tunnel that would run twice the length of the one under the English Channel, and bore deep into one of Asia’s active earthquake zones. At the same time as completed, it would be the world’s longest underwater tunnel, creating a rail link between two northern port cities.

Throughout China, equally ambitious projects with multibillion-dollar price tags are by presently underway. The world’s major bridge. The biggest airport. The longest gas pipeline. An $80 billion effort to divert water from the south of the country, where it is abundant, to a parched section of the north, along a route that covers additional than 1,500 miles.

Such enormous infrastructure projects are a Chinese tradition. From the Great Wall to the Grand Canal and the Three Gorges Dam, this country for centuries has used colossal public-works projects to showcase its engineering prowess and project its economic may .
Presently, as doubts emerge about the country’s three-decade boom, China’s leaders are moving even additional aggressively, doubling down on mega infrastructure. In November, for instance, the powerful National Development and Reform Commission approved plans to spend nearly $115 billion on 21 supersize infrastructure projects, inclunding new airports and high-speed rail lines

China has always had this history of mega projects,” says Huang Yukon, an economist and senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think tank based in Washington. “It’s part of the blood, the culture, the nature of its society. To have an impact on the country, they’ve got to be large.”

Whether China really needs this much large infrastructure — or can even afford it — is a contentious issue.
The infrastructure plans run counter to Beijing’s commitment to reduce its heavy reliance on government-led investment to fuel increase. And some economists worry that the country may from presently on be mired in mega deficit.

According to China’s National Audit Office, local government deficit alone stood at about $3.1 trillion in 2013, additional than a third the size of all economy. The high level of deficit, analysts warn, could stunt increase for a long time. “People should be concerned because very few of these large projects generate cash,” said Victor Shih, a China specialist who teaches political economy at the University of California, San Diego.
And from presently on China’s leaders are so confident of the price and necessity of building on an epic scale that engineers are mapping out plans for decades approaching.

Shanghai is considered a model, a spectacularly rich metropolis of 25 million residents. Undergirding the city is a patchwork of supersize infrastructure — huge airports, subway lines, sewage systems and power plants.
In the city’s thriving financial center, workers are putting finishing touches on the Shanghai Tower, a $2.4 billion cloud-piercer that at 2,073 feet is the world’s second-tallest building. Only the Burj Khalifa in Dubai is taller, at 2,716 feet.

Further east, the city is building the world’s major playground, Shanghai Disney Resort, which at the same time as it opens around 2016 will be surrounded by a 225-acre Magic Kingdom-style park, a development expected to cost additional than $5 billion. A city-owned company is helping finance the project.

Shanghai can afford the huge price tags. The fast-growing city is a financial center and a major tourist destination.

But other cities don’t necessarily have the means to pay for such huge infrastructure projects.
In Tianjin, about 70 miles southeast of Beijing, the city has borrowed heavily to create what some have called a replica of New York City, with complexes modeled next Rockefeller Center and Lincoln Center. Today, though, the area is a virtual ghost town. Dozens of office towers and luxury developments sit blank, half completed.

And here in Dalian, a city of six million in the northeast, the proposed underwater rail tunnel to Yantai is just one piece of a master plan that includes a 163-mile urban transit system. Work is as well underway on what the city says will be the world’s major off-shore airport, a $4.3 billion development on an artificial island created with landfill, covering additional than eight square miles.
“It makes sense to accelerate infrastructure spending during a downturn, at the same time as capital and labor are underemployed,” says David Dollar, the former country director in China for the World Bank and presently at the Brookings Institution in Washington. But “if the increase rate is propped up through building unnecessary infrastructure, from presently on there could be a sharp slowdown that reveals that the infrastructure was really not needed at all.”

A lot of experts say such projects as well exact a heavy toll on local communities and the environment, as builders displace people, clear forests, reroute rivers and erect dams.

In the northwest, in the city of Lanzhou, the local government has backed plans to flatten the tops of 700 low-level mountains to make way for a new business district, despite concerns about the damage to the local ecosystem. Dam-building has as well wreaked havoc, creating water shortages, environmental damage and may have even helped set off earthquakes in southwest China, according to some scientists.
“The perilous path is the notion you can control nature,” ” said Paul K. Gellert, a sociologist at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. “There will always be negative social and environmental consequences.”

As a one-party national controlled by the Communist Party, China can easily muster the political will and financial resources to undertake such huge projects. And for presently, it is backing — and even encouraging — municipalities to think large.
“They have an authoritarian system. And so they can do all this without opposition — this is key,” says Gerardo del Cerro Santamaría, an expert on mega projects at Cooper Union in New York. “In the West, civil society participates, and in a lot of cases, opposes large projects.”
Proponents say mega projects can bring better efficiencies. Large dams and wind farms can cut carbon emissions, while mass transit can help reduce oil consumption, thus delivering greener solutions.

Other mega projects could bolster China’s position as a manufacturing and trading powerhouse. In November, the government said its freight rail link between eastern China and Spain had opened, allowing factory goods to reach Spain in just over 20 days. It is presently the world’s longest rail journey, far surpassing the route of the famed Trans-Siberian Railway.

China as well sees hidden benefits in such projects, inclunding the ability to gain new scientific and technical expertise.
As a result, bridge-building in China has become something akin to an Olympic event. In 2007, next China completed the longest sea-crossing bridge in Hangzhou, the country has regularly broken records. China presently claims the longest bridge of any kind, the highest bridge and, in 2011, a new successor to the longest sea-crossing bridge, 26.4 miles long, in the eastern city of Qingdao.

“For China, a lot of this is about building a national identity. Mega projects are suited for that,” says Bent Flyvbjerg, an authority on mega projects who teaches at Oxford University. “It’s a lighthouse for all to see what the Chinese country can do.”

It is the type of engineering expertise the government wants its national-owned enterprises to export — and that is by presently happening. Boston is buying subway cars from China. Argentina, Pakistan and Russia have asked China to upgrade their infrastructure. Last month, Chinese construction teams began work on an ambitious $50 billion canal across Nicaragua that could some day rival the Panama Canal.

“They have the idea that they’re going to be doing infrastructure for the rest of the world,” says Mr. Huang at the Carnegie Institute.
In doing so, China is pushing the boundaries of infrastructure-building, with ever bolder proposals. The Dalian tunnel looks small compared to the new idea to build an “international railway” that would link China to the United States by burrowing under the Bering Strait and creating a tunnel between Russia and Alaska.

“The technology is by presently there,” said Wang Mengshu, a member of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and an adviser on the Dalian tunnel proposition. “Think about it. If we can build a railway to the North Pole, it would be convenient for us to go to the North Pole.”

Related Articles
  • Africa's Relationship With China Is Ancient History

    2017/07/02 In 2002 South Africa's Parliament unveiled a digital reproduction of a map - of China, the Middle East and Africa - that some speculated could be the initial map of the African continent. The Da Ming Hun Yi Tu - the Comprehensive Map of the Great Ming Empire - was drawn up around 1389 during the Ming Dynasty, according to historian Hyunhee Park.
  • Climate change laws around the world

    2017/05/14 There has been a 20-fold increase in the number of global climate change laws since 1997, according to the most comprehensive database of relevant policy and legislation. The database, produced by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and the Sabin Center on Climate Change Law, includes more than 1,200 relevant policies across 164 countries, which account for 95% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
  • China Economic Overview GDP growth to slow to +6.5% in 2016

    2017/05/08 China Slowing growth and eroding policy buffers
  • The New China-Africa Relations: 4 Trends to Watch

    2016/08/07 This week, the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) convened its initial summit since 2006. Chinese President Xi Jinping joined additional than 40 leaders of African nations for the massive conference in Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Asia Economic Roundup: July 2016

    2016/07/18 Without a doubt Britain’s decision to abandon the European project will be remembered globally as a wake-up call for political elites around the world. It seems the people chose to go against immediate economic interest and accept an extra financial turmoil in order to address deeply seated social and identity issues. Although Asia’s exposure to the UK is relatively limited and this is not exactly a “Lehman Moment”, nonetheless we can expect a lively debate as policymakers in Asia look for an appropriate response to address the needs of vulnerable households.