Americas > North America > United States > What Africa Needs to Boost Trade With the U.S.

United States: What Africa Needs to Boost Trade With the U.S.

2014/08/06

Ahead of the United States-Africa summit which President Barack Obama is convening next week, southern African trade expert Joshua Setipa outlines what he would say if he was to present Africa's case in Washington.

If I was to go to Washington next week, I would tell the government that our relationship with the United States is one which we as Africa cherish very much, but that it is one that could use some refinement; that we need to revisit a few issues to make sure that U.S. priorities and U.S. aspirations in this relationship are consistent with Africa's political priorities.

Africa's relations with the United States are of course about additional than trade and investment . There are a whole raft of issues of mutual interest - security being just one. But if we are to focus only on trade and investment , I would begin by providing an overview of where we are presently.

If you look at the structure of today’s trade relations between the U.S. and Africa, it's primarily dominated by the export of fuel and fuel-related products and - with the exception of South Africa - the volume of manufacturing exports from sub-Saharan Africa to the United States is very limited. So my priority would be to ask the U.S.: how do we address this together? How do we look at ways of remedying this and diversifying Africa’s export basket, because relatively few African nations either export or have the prospect someday of exporting petroleum products.

Again I would as well say to the U.S. that we cannot talk about strengthening our trade relationship without addressing Africa's infrastructure deficit. This infrastructure deficit - transport and logistics-related infrastructure being the obvious example - affects not just U.S.-Africa trade potential but it as well continues to undermine intra-African trade potential. It undermines the attainment of one of the key political priorities of Africa, regional integration, which will benefit from improved infrastructure links between nations.

Furthermore, I would reaffirm Africa’s continued support for The U.S.'s African Increase and Opportunity Act (AGOA), the law which extends trade preferences to qualifying African nations, and highlight that it has been a very positive contribution to economic increase - though some nations have benefitted additional than others.

Part the key questions for the next that I would propose for joint consideration would be: why has there been limited success in accessing the financing mechanisms that are part of the AGOA framework? How can the U.S. and Africa work jointly to enhance incentives that will enhance U.S. private investments in public infrastructure in Africa? How can the U.S. enhance its support for the efforts by presently being undertaken by the African Development Bank aimed at mobilizing financial resources for infrastructure finance?

And we should not lose sight of the fact that by infrastructure we are not talking only about the bricks and mortar part, nor the highways and bridges – we are as well referring to the “soft” trade facilitation framework issues inclunding customs modernization and so forth. In fact, the U.S. and Africa have an excellent opportunity to enhance their cooperation in the trade facilitation area through the new World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade Facilitation concluded at the Bali WTO ministerial conference in December 2013.

Unless infrastructure continues to remain a priority in this relationship, and new and innovative financing ideas come into play, we cannot talk about enhancing or broadening the U.S.-Africa trade relationship. Africa’s political and economic priority is regional integration, trade is a key element of this priority and it therefore goes without saying that Africa’s relationships with strategic partners like the U.S. will be judged on how they have supported the succcess of this priority.

Next infrastructure, my next priority would be agriculture. For example, you have 34 nations in Africa that are competitive in the production of cotton, from presently on this potential continues to be undermined by U.S. subsidies for their cotton producers. We need to address this in a additional meaningful manner than has been done to date. The WTO Doha Round of trade talks still presents the best opportunity to address this issue and therefore the U.S. should reassure Africa of its commitment towards concluding the Doha Round.

There is a positive story emerging from the Western Cape in South Africa: the success of the citrus industry in growing its exports to the U.S. This is a demonstration of what can be completed through dedicated cooperation to improve the capacity of African farmers to export to the U.S.

This support has focused primarily in improving the capacity of South African farmers to comply with, part others, American health and safety standards - the “sanitary and phytosanitary” requirements which need to be met to sell products to U.S. consumers. This experience can serve as a model for the rest of Africa so that additional African farmers access the U.S. agriculture market. At present the reality is that the average sub-Saharan African farmer does not have the capacity to comply with these kinds of requirements.

Agriculture and food security has been identified a key priority by the U.S. in its policy towards Africa and this summit provides an opportunity to review evolution and to identify new ideas to enhance the effectiveness of cooperation in this sector.

Unless agriculture is addressed in a additional meaningful manner, its potential to drive African economic empowerment will continue to be undermined. And the reality is that addressing challenges to the potential of the African agricultural sector is not limited only to market access. There is a whole range of issues which require attention just as urgently, inclunding access to finance and improving market data flows and trade finance.

Considering the potential contribution of agriculture to growing the trade relationship - and the number of Africans who depend on agriculture for a livelihood - if we were to address these issues in a focused and sustainable manner, we could realize our mutual objective of delivering real and sustainable economic empowerment to African farmers. So agriculture cannot be left out - it has be part and parcel of the next of this relationship.

Again there is a whole range of other issues and concerns around AGOA that need to be addressed. It is equitable to begin by recalling that in the U.S., unlike most democracies, regulation of trade is constitutionally vested in Congress, so the authority to conclude international trade agreements lies not with the government but with Congress. So the government will work with Congress to push for a stronger relationship but at the end of the day it is not within their mandate to make the final decision.

Despite this limitation, I would say to the government: apart from South Africa, completely a number of other nations as well have been able through AGOA to increase their exports into the U.S., mainly in the form of clothing and textiles. So how do we ensure that that is not threatened by all the other processes that are running parallel to this relationship?

Within the WTO, the Doha Round process continuously seeks to drive tariffs downwards, from presently on eroding the competitive edge that AGOA gives to beneficiaries.

You as well have other bilateral processes that the U.S. is party to: the Trans-Pacific Partnership, for example, which will give significant preferential access to nations like Vietnam and possibly Cambodia. This will present African clothing and textile exporters with the challenge of competing with nations that are additional competitive and much closer to the U.S. market than they are.

For example, the case of my own country Lesotho, which is considered one of AGOA’s success stories, it takes around 25 days to ship a container from Maseru to the U.S., compared with around 14 days from Vietnam to the west coast of the U.S.

As well, continued investment and increase for this sector in Lesotho is very much dependent on continued AGOA preferential access, which includes flexible rules of origin provisions. There are currently around 34,000 employees in this sector, making it the biggest in our economy. Any disruption to it will have a devastating social impact.

But we as well need to look at AGOA additional broadly. Africa needs not just a simple extension of the law beyond its expiry in 2015 – we need a additional comprehensive revision that includes an extension of at least 15 years.

This has a direct bearing on investment flows into nations benefiting from AGOA; if an investor is to make investment decisions on the basis of guaranteed business-free, quota-free market access to the U.S., a much longer time frame than five years would be of clear benefit.

Finally on AGOA, we need as well to say to the U.S.: let's work together in the WTO to make sure that AGOA is compatible with the WTO rules and that it is not open to the threats and challenges that it currently faces, while at the same time respecting the fact that there are other developing nations that are as well seeking to enhance their trade relations with the U.S.

To conclude my intervention, I would re-emphasize that to build a durable, long-lasting and mutually beneficial trade relationship, the critical issues which need to be addressed as a matter of priority are: access to finance; financing for infrastructure; real, targeted financing and support for agriculture, particularly for smaller farmers; and as well how we can provide incentives for U.S. corporations to invest in the sectors other than oil and gas to ensure that the increase we are both seeking to achieve is broad-based and sustainable.

I would round up by reminding the United States that everything it does with or in Africa has to be consistent with the continental economic and political priority of achieving full regional integration. Through enhanced regional integration, the full potential of this trade relationship will be realized.

Joshua Setipa is a former chief executive officer of the Lesotho National Development Corporation. This column was developed from a presentation he made to a roundtable on the summit organized by the South African Institute of International Affairs and the Graduate School of Business at the University of Cape Town.

Related Articles
  • Former BofA trader fined £60,000 for ‘algo baiting’

    2017/11/25 A former Bank of America Merrill Lynch bond trader has been fined £60,000 for manipulating the price of Dutch national loans in a case of so-called algo baiting — the initial time the UK’s financial watchdog has issued a fine for the practice in fixed gain markets.
  • How the drive for North American energy independence could save NAFTA

    2017/11/25 The original 1993 agreement excluded rules and regulations for the energy sector largely because Mexico still had a nationalized energy industry. However, current President Enrique Peña Nieto enacted in 2014 that opened up the industry to private and foreign investment . The renegotiation of NAFTA therefore presents an opportune time to harmonize the three nations’ large and diversified energy industries. Theoretically, this would create an entire region of energy independence and affordable and reliable access to fuel.
  • PM Modi And President Trump Shake Hands In Manila

    2017/11/13 Prime Minister Narendra Modi has arrived in Manila for a three-day visit to attend the ASEAN-India and East Asia summits. The ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) region including India, comprises a combined population of 1.85 billion people, one-fourth of the global population.
  • Apple shifted billions offshore to avoid tax

    2017/11/08 New relevations about Apple's tax avoidance strategy are making headlines as the Paradise Papers scandal unfolds further. EU finance ministers are due to discuss the issue during talks in Brussels on Tuesday. Apple has denied accusations in the Paradise Papers investigation that it moved its operations from Ireland to an offshore center to avoid tax. Documents cited by German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung on Monday suggested that offshore law firm Appleby, which is based in multiple tax havens, helped the iPhone maker move billions of dollars in revenues collected in Ireland to the Channel Islands to chief off increased European Union scrutiny of its tax affairs in Dublin.