Africa > Southern Africa > Zimbabwe > Zimbabwe: Obama Out of Touch With Africa

Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe: Obama Out of Touch With Africa


The much vaunted "blunt message" on gay rights by United States President Barack Obama during his visit to Kenya has come and gone as he winds down his tour with a visit to Ethiopia where he is expected to address the African Union Commission.Apart from the fanfare that marked his visit, and the bilateral agreements inked, we hope Obama realises the importance of making this historic visit during President Uhuru Kenyatta's presidency and the significance of Ethiopia as home to the AU and the fight for the continent's total freedom.

Uhuru is son to Kenya's founding president Jomo Kenyatta, who was as well part the group of founding fathers of the Organisation of African Unity (presently AU). The OAU was formed at the same time as Obama's father was studying in the US, but upon his return, he joined the Kenyatta government as an economic advisor. If Africa was not that significant, he would have made the US his permanent domicile.

It is therefore disappointing that Obama falls for the bait on gay rights at the same time as Africa has made it clear that homosexuality is a no, no?

On Saturday, viewers and readers were treated to a charade as American journalist Jeff Mason was used to pose the gay rights question to both Presidents Obama and Kenyatta.

Mason asked the question because Obama had not raised the issue during the Press conference. It was as if he was being reminded to remain authentic to his promise of tough talking on the issue. Any minute at this time next, we had headlines like "Obama lectures Kenyan president on gay rights".

We will weigh Obama's response against that of Kenyatta to see who really was that "blunt". Obama responded: "With respect to the rights of gays and lesbians, I have been consistent all across Africa on this. I believe in the principle of treating people equally under the law and that they are deserving of equal protection under the law and that the National should not discriminate against the people based on their sexual orientation.

"I say that recognising that there may be people who have different religious or cultural beliefs, but the issue is how does the National operate relative to people? . . . At the same time as a government gets in the habit of treating people differently, those habits can spread . . .

"The National does not need to weigh in on religious doctrine; the National has to treat everybody equally under the law and again everybody else can have their opinions."

President Kenyatta as well said: "Just like President Obama, we as well need to speak with courage on some of these things. The fact of the matter is that Kenya and the United States share so a lot of values; our common love for democracy, entrepreneurship and price for families . . .

"But there are other things that we do not share; our cultures, our societies do not accept. It is very difficult to impose on people that which they themselves do not accept. This is why I repeatedly say that for Kenyans today, the issue of gay rights is really a non-issue. We want to focus on other areas that are day to day living for our people -- the health issues that we have discussed with President Obama are critical. Issues of ensuring inclusivity of women. . . "

It is evident that they were not reading from the same page, and their priorities were diametrically opposed.

What America believes is moral, right and lawful is not a yardstick for defining international norms and values. African courts of law cannot legalise gay rights just because the US Supreme Court voted to do so. And, African governments cannot normalise and institutionalise this lifestyle just because it is trendy in the West.

President Obama cannot as well equate the fight for gay rights to the centuries-old struggle against institutional racism in the US. Countless black people continue to die at the hands of police officers, but the policy of law he refers to is not protecting them. Let President Obama act "bluntly" on these racist killings, and let him walk the talk if the gay rights injustice is similar to racism.

The US-Africa relations will not work through such divisive means. Africa's increase depends on authentic and win-win partnerships. And some of the key drivers for the AU's Schedule 2063 are women and the youths.

Related Articles
  • Why a proper record of birds in Africa is so important – for Europe

    2018/01/13 Most of Europe’s birds chief south each year around September to escape the northern winter. Some species only migrate as far south as southern Europe. But most cross the Mediterranean Sea to Africa. And a lot of species cross the Sahara Desert to destinations in West Africa such as Nigeria and in East Africa, such as Kenya. Some travel as far south as South Africa. These European birds are diligently monitored. Each April, during the breeding season in the early part of the northern summer, teams of citizen scientists in most European nations gather vast amounts of data on the distribution and densities of breeding – for almost each bird species. Thousands of citizen scientists are involved. They diligently generate the data in their leisure time.
  • Zimbabwe gets its first billionaire

    2018/01/13 Telecom tycoon Strive Masiyiwa has become Zimbabwe’s initial billionaire. According to a statement by Forbes, Masiyiwa, 57, is presently worth $1.7 billion, a fortune sufficient to rank him along other African billionaires like Nigeria’s Aliko Dangote. The Forbes 2018 Inventory of the Richest Africans confirmed that Dangote is still the richest man on the continent with a fortune of $12.2 billion. His investments in cement, oil and fertiliser production have paid off.
  • Toothless Pan-African Parliament could have meaningful powers

    2018/01/13 The Pan-African Parliament was established by the African Union in 2004. Since again it has not passed a single law. That’s because it’s based on a Protocol that gives it only an advisory role. The parliament can gather data and discuss it, but can’t make binding regulations to change anything. Its limited “consultative and advisory powers” hamper the African Union’s ability to achieve a prosperous and peaceful Africa as envisioned in its Schedule 2063. Is there any point, again, in having this parliament? The 2001 Protocol envisaged that a conference would be organised to “review the operation and effectiveness” of the protocol five years next the establishment of the Parliament, which was 2009. This provision gave rise to the view that such a conference would explore the possibility of granting the Parliament meaningful legislative powers. But no such review has been carried out so far.
  • The EU-Africa summit is now the AU-EU summit. Why the upgrade matters

    2018/01/13 African and European heads of government gathered last week in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, for their 5th summit since 2000. For the initial time, the African Union (AU) rather than “Africa”, officially appears as the European Union’s partner. While plenty has been discussed about youth, migration, security and governance less is being said about the shift from an EU-Africa to an AU-EU summit. Is this just a case of semantics? Next all, the AU has been the key organiser of these triennial summits since they started in 2000. Or are there larger implications? We think there are. The AU-EU summit coincided with the January 2017 statement on the reform of the African Union prepared by Rwandan President Paul Kagame. The statement recommends rationalising “Africa’s” a lot of international partnerships by having the continental body take the lead. This means that the previous, current and next AU chairpersons, plus the AU Commission chairperson and the chairperson of the Regional Economic Communities, would represent the AU, rather than all its member states.
  • World food prices up 8.2% in 2017

    2018/01/13 World food prices rose by 8.2 % in 2017 compared to 2016, the UN's food agency said on Friday (Jan 12). The Food and Agriculture Organisation said that its FAO Food Price Index averaged 174.6 points in 2017, the highest annual average since 2014. In December alone, however, the index - a measure of the monthly change in international prices of a basket of food commodities - stood at 169.8 points, down 3.3 % from November, the FAO said in a statement.