Asia > Eastern Asia > China > Africa And Middle East Famines: How China Can Do More

China: Africa And Middle East Famines: How China Can Do More

2017/07/09

The unprecedented outbreak of famine early this year in Africa and the Middle East can be traced to conflict as the root cause. Can China step in to help mitigate the calamity through its Belt and Road initiative?

Famine broke out in South Sudan in March 2017. At around the same time, the United Nations announced that Nigeria, Somalia and Yemen were as well on the verge of being hit by long draught, putting around 20 million at risk of starvation. The UN described this as an unprecedented humanitarian crisis and appealed to the international community to donate US$4.4 billion — with little success.

Conflict, the root cause of these famines, will need to be resolved. China’s increasing involvement in the Middle East and Africa gives the country the incentive and the capacity to entirely deliver both short and long term food security interventions that can enable peacebuilding and economic increase.

Unprecedented Humanitarian Tragedy

These famines have no precedence in both need and scale. According to FAO Assistant Director-General Kostas Stamoulis, the UN has at no time before experienced four threats of famine in multiple nations instantly. Stephen O’Brien, the UN humanitarian chief, stated that this is the major humanitarian crisis since the creation of the world body.

With nations contributing millions of dollars of aid and loans to Africa and the Middle East, the threat of famine seems contradictory. However, the conflicts in these nations have stalled economic increase and exacerbated food insecurity by displacing farmers from their livelihoods. Continued distribution of aid and hefty loan packages will have limited success if the nations cannot solve the root of their problems and receive long term investments.

China, an active aid contributor and investor in the Middle East and Africa, stands to gain the majority if the nations can break the linkages between food insecurity, conflict and poverty. Given China’s long-standing aversion to military intervention, food security interventions through humanitarian efforts are additional aligned to its foreign policy principles and they can be levers that the country can pull both in the short and long term to aid peacebuilding and economic development.

China’s Strategic Interests in Mideast and Africa

In recent years, Nigeria, South Sudan and Yemen have become strategic locations for China’s long-term geostrategic plans. For instance, in Yemen, the country stands in the way of China’s Belt One Road Initiative (BRI). The new Silk Road passes through the Bab al-Mandab strait, controlled by Yemen, to the Red Sea.

South Sudan, holding most of the region’s oil, is significant for China’s strategy to fasten new energy resources. China imports almost 46% of South Sudanese oil through Port Sudan. Since January 2014, oil production has averaged 163,000 barrels per day, with oil revenue equalling roughly US$20 million per month.

Nigeria has been the flagship of China’s in general Africa strategy, seen through the all of investment China has made in this country. Before this year, Foreign Affairs Minister Wang Yi visited his Nigerian counterpart Geoffrey Onyeama and stated that China would be investing $40 billion into the Nigerian economy with a focus on energy infrastructure and transportation.

Violence Trap

Unfortunately, war has hindered the nations’ ability to break out of poverty and move toward a next of peaceful economic development. If conflict is not due resolved, China’s initiatives and investments are at risk. The World Bank’s World Development Statement in 2011 established that the constraint on development is not a poverty trap but a violence trap.

One case study used in the statement looked at two African states: Burundi and Burkina Faso. Until 1990, both nations had similar levels of gain and increase rates. But in the late 1993, a civil war overtook Burundi and 300,000 people died in the upcoming years. Burkina Faso remained at peace and is presently two and a half times richer.

One can see this on the world scale; low GDP per capita is robustly associated with both large-scale political conflict and high rates of homicide. The key to the economic development lies in addressing conflict initial.

In the short term, the World Development Statement recommended restoring people’s confidence in government as a critical initial step. If administered correctly, food assistance can play an significant role. While food aid has been criticised for prolonging conflict, China’s role as a key investor could help address the major driver of aid-related conflict: misappropriation of food by the powerful.

A recent widely read research article from Yale University studied the effects of US food aid on recipient nations and discovered that on average, food aid increased the duration of conflict because parties in power would steal aid or use it for their own benefit. For instance, in Afghanistan, aid organisations had to give over one-third of the food aid to the Taliban.

Twin-Track Approach

However, China’s strong relationships with the nations’ governments as a significant stakeholder would help provide the leverage needed to ensure that food aid gets to the populations in need. At the same time as food aid is distributed correctly, there are case studies that demonstrate its ability to replace confidence part communities.

In war-torn Liberia, an evaluation of a relief and recovery operation found that 90 % of the 1,200 participants interviewed believed that the short-term jobs provided through the food-for-work programme helped reconciliation and the re-building of the community. There is no silver bullet to end conflict, but delivering relief for communities can provide the much-needed foundation to enable peacebuilding.

In the long term, investments into the agricultural sector will need to complement food aid to make communities additional resilient and for the country to increase economic increase. The FAO calls this the twin-track approach. Hunger needs to be eradicated initial to increase people’s capacity for productivity. Once they are able to work, investments into agricultural technology and knowledge can help people become self-sufficient.

For long-term economic gains, the agricultural sector is an significant entry point. Investment in the agricultural sector, according to the World Bank, is two to four times additional effective in raising incomes part the very poor than increase in other sectors. At the same time as both tracks are invested into for the long term, the linkages between hunger and poverty can be broken.

Short and long-term food security interventions can therefore help China’s strategic initiatives and investments bear fruit. The country’s increasing role as an investor and aid contributor to Africa and the Middle East gives China appropriate leverage and incentive to ensure that the interventions are done correctly. With the rest of the international community staying silent, China could be the nations’ last hope.

Related Articles
  • Chinese official expresses concern over political unrest in Pakistan

    2017/11/22 A top Chinese official has expressed concern over the prevailing political instability in Pakistan that could negatively impact the pace of the projects started under the ambitious USD 50 billion CPECBSE -4.45 % initiative, according to a media statement today. The Chinese delegation expressed weariness during the Joint Cooperation Committee (JCC) of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) conference held here yesterday.
  • The Belt and Road Initiative and Asia’s changing order

    2017/11/15 In the two days of meetings from 8 November between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Trump’s initial national visit, it appears that they did not talk at all about the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Trump’s tour reflected the tendency of his government to see Asia entirely through the lens of bilateral ties and crises. US Secretary of National Rex Tillerson and Trump have stated that the United States seeks to sustain and protect a free and open Indo-Pacific, but the inability to match that concept with either a meaningful strategic vision or substantive policy was plainly on display.
  • China, Vietnam Reach 'Consensus' To Uphold 'Peace In South China Sea'

    2017/11/13 Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan as well have claims in the South China Sea, and the dispute has long been seen as a potential trigger for conflict in Asia. The Communist leaders of China and Vietnam reached a "consensus" on handling the contested South China Sea, Chinese national media reported Sunday, hours next US President Donald Trump offered to mediate in the dispute. Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Vietnamese Communist Party chief Nguyen Phu Trong during a national visit to Hanoi on Sunday, next Trump as well visited the country.
  • Saudi Arabia’s Footprints in Southeast Asia

    2017/11/02 At the same time as King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud of Saudi Arabia embarked on a month-long trip to Asia in February this year, Western media outlets led with incredulous stories about the monarch’s large entourage and their mountain of luggage. Traditionally obsessed with the desert kingdom’s human rights record and the national-sponsored brand of Islam, those same outlets took delight in touting the trip as a sign of Saudi economic weakness.